#Turbo boost switcher for windows pro

Reaper will ignore the 1024 samples value entered there and assume you will control this with different software.ģrd pic: Both disabled in Reaper. Reaper sets the connected interface(s) to 96k and the block size to 1024 samples.Ģnd pic: Control of sample rate enabled in Reaper but block size disabled.

Click it again and the mark goes away to turn it off.ġst pic: Control of both sample rate and block size enabled in Reaper. You see a graphic check mark or hash mark (like you might make on a grocery list as you check off items) when you click it on. There's a little square box next to the words 'Request sample rate' & 'Request block size'. What control panel are you using to control the sample rate and block size for the connected interface (including the built-in)? The Reaper Preferences/audio/device page or other? You are aware that checking the boxes next to those controls in Reaper enables them and unchecked disables them (to allow other apps to be used)? Tip: Disable this per track for any inserted 3rd party plugin instead of disabling it globally. Reaper has a feature called Anticipative fx Processing that is not compatible with all (most?) 3rd party plugins. Is this really a CPU hit? Does Activity Monitor agree? A rule of thumb is if you have clicks/pops but you aren't actually maxing out CPU use (not even a single core), this is a telltale of a crashing plugin. But something that can slow down a machine like this? That doesn't sound right. I understand some of these are pretty over the top with processing needs and some of them even use more than 2gb ram. The one thing I don't have a lot of hands on experience with is the more gargantuan instrument sampling plugins. That machine should be so absurdly over powered for ANY audio work that it would be silly to even question. So I wouldn't be shocked if, for example, it doesn't handle low latency use well. 3rd party interfaces made specifically for studio or live sound needs. I wouldn't expect the Mac's built-in audio interface to be NOT efficient.īut of course the built-in interface seems aimed at basic home theater needs vs. If anybody else has other conclusions, he's welcome :-)

#Turbo boost switcher for windows pro

I was working (till few month) with Logic Pro which has better performance in 1024 (more tracks and more Acustica Plugin). Then, I think that there no other way to optimize Reaper performance if you want to mix with 1024 Buffer.

Because some users said that Reaper doesn't like it so muchĢ- Turbo Boost Switcher off - (with Turbo Boost Switcher) Switch off before launch Reaper but no noticeable change. I try to use only VST plugins = no change.ġ - Multi-threading off (with Xcode/instruments). To get better performances, I try to change some settings in Reaper Preferences but without noticeable changes. (But impossible to add new real time midi parts with 1seconde Latency).

To avoid all sound issues, the Buffer must be at 4096. With a Buffer at 512, lots of clic and drop. 40 track instruments with Kontakt, 6 Audio tracks, 4 Sub Groups, 3 Reverb, 60 AU/VST Plugin, 4 Acustica plugins on Sub Grp and 2 Acustica plugins on Master track. I did lots of tests to increase Reaper performance and I am a bit disappointed.